Arshile Gorky, After Khorkum, 1940/42
© 2018 The Arshile Gorky Foundation / The Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York
This essay first appeared in Brilliant Corners in 1975 and is republished by ASAP/J for the first time since its original appearance. Please also read Nick Sturm’s essay on Notley’s work here.
to be read by
people too young to have museum claustrophobia. Who
are “educating” themselves about art or get all damp
and glowing with color and light in front of a famous
masterpiece, and also enjoy air conditioning nymphets
baskets access to a coffee shop and, too, a gift shop
full of unattainable beautiful jewelry.
I hang out at
the Chicago Art Institute––since 1972 I guess, when
pregnant I would come panting home from a visit with
the paintings and announce to my husband “The history
of art is hilarious” or “I finally realized today that
it must be as great to be Vuillard as deKooning.” He
would look up just a smidgeon wider-eyed then resume
reading the latest Travis McGee. Later, I found out
I could go out and get away from the kids, at the CAT,
and have long flights of ecstasy and with my very own
membership card read in the Institute library Art in
America, or weep over Kahnweiler’s version of the
death of Juan Gris. After the lovely weeping I would
go examine the (usually) four Gris’ on exhibit upstairs;
look at the portrait of Picasso and wonder at the
intimacy between more or less screwball idea and
fullblown beauty. Systems and all light. Picasso does
after all look like a waffle iron with a permanent
wave. At home later I would write
I see the checkerboard through
the newspaper the table
through the checkerboard and the
checkerboard the newspaper
and the table, and the wall-
paper rose and guitar for
each and the somber tipsy glass
because painting was teaching me what a word like
“tipsy” could do to the flat. Like in Gris’ Abstraction
(Guitar and Glass), what that most pretty rose
does in that painting which is all straight lines and
severe curves. I guess I did have Gris then figured
for a tipsy melancholic sweetheart, and I plagiarized
also many good lines, for my poems, from his letters.
You can too. I also I hope learned something about
“heroic constancy” with regard to talent or its
seeming lack.
However, I didn’t know it but I was mainly doing
a number with Excavation by deKooning, sort of knocking
at the door all the time; and incidentally having a
Gorky itch in the rear right-hand area of my brain.
I WANTED IN. 30 years behind the times but lots of
people are.
And what I found out was:
The thing about Excavation is that you have to allow
yourself to be seduced, or actually just fall right
into the excavation. One day I was weak and swooned on
in. (To be continued) ________________
(Next Day)
Excavation you see is very discrete even given
its size––from across the room an almost non-color
well-mannered painting and you could walk right by it.
Philip Whalen did, and I thought he just didn’t like
deKooning and he being my hero (Whalen, not to mention
deKooning) I quiveringly kept any mention of the
painting stuck at the top of my throat. When we got
home my husband said to him How did you like Excavation?
Excavation! he thundered, was it there? I didn’t even
see it!
It is now impossible to miss because it and all
the modern American paintings have been installed in
their own good space beside huge windows and a garden,
there’s no railing or roping before it you can go
right up to it and bathe and find all the other colors
and ride around on the black lines and visit the new
faces and monsters that pop up. I am a mere simpleton.
Excavation is a real person.
And the new installation
of the paintings is a real improvement. On a bright
day you can see the blue in Franz Kline’s
Contrada. If you have trouble with works that don’t have
“colors” on them you can see the sculptures period
(Though the poet Maureen Owen’s favorite is Richard
Hunt’s The Chase because she is appallingly pun-
conscious). You can see, because of the lighting the
greater space, the works you were ignoring because
the names weren’t “big” enough, Estaban Vincete’s
Growth, Stamos’ Classic Boundaries e.g. Sweet delights
you want to press your cheek to.
At first I didn’t know what was happening to
all the American works. Last fall they started disap-
pearing roomful by roomful. Excavation! would I ever
see it again? Had Joan Mitchell’s shitty-rainbowed
Cityscape so dear to my heart been stuck in the
basement forever, with the Gorkys the Institute
claimed to have but never seemed to hang? Suddenly
only Alex Katz’s Vincent And Tony was left – boy was it
painted and paint on the huge white wall near the
staircase the whole museum could have been built
just for it for our happiness. Their full paint soft
lips. Katz I think wants to kiss many people long and
hard, not an incomprehensible desire.
Everything then began reappearing along with
a few surprises––Andy Warhol’s decadal coup and master-
piece of Chairman Mao. Would the other paintings
survive it? Whose minds had been boggled during the
making of so big a silkscreen? and then the masterfully
acrylicked it, and Mao’s Cheek and Button. Well
Jules Olitski Born in Snovsk and Richard Diebenkorn
Ocean Park No. 45 hold their own space fine beside it,
in part of course because there’s that space now
too
would you believe over and over
Philip Guston’s Rite? with those almost flaccid forms
that so cohere that it is one of the most mysterious
miracles in your life? Go up and touch David Smith’s
Cubi VII, when no guard’s looking, and find out how
small and grand you are.
………….………….………….……One day, After Xhorkum, Gorky,
appears and my life changes. (Where are the other Gorkys
besides The Plough The Song II, Mr. and Mrs. CAT? what
happened to him and his mother; and the workout-in-crude
vase of flowers? that I so much wanted to write a poem
like. I saw the drawing 1936 of his mother, my muse, last
week and absorbed it into my whole physique. She has
marvelously flowered intestinal shapes about her left
ear, to mention the idiosyncratic because I cannot
survive the sublime sublimely.) After Xhorkum has become
for me Numero Uno. I think it is the most beautiful and
perfect work of art I have ever seen.
________________
So I’m there again today
Things are still being changed
around where is Stamos
where is Esteban? If
you put down Hans Hofmann
you’re stupid ‘cause I’m
digging Blue Rhythm, 1950
with its black window into
outer space comet spicers. Some grey
sculpture thing is sticking its tongue
out at Wayne Thiebaud’s Ties
Rows of Ties, all that Stella
Stuff–-Ludwig Sander (Arapaho
II) you look pretty great (who
are you?) and Greyed Rainbow
(Pollock) I see you. Mark
Rothko Painting (1953-4) You
are loving me, Gorky
you are my dream
of love
in mastery
a rock for the eye.
One thing (going back now) I really
dig to do is make sure in Hopper’s Night Hawks the salt
and pepper shakers napkin holders sugar container
mysterious ketchup/vinegar cruet are in place. That
waiter runs a neat counter. And I could tell you about
Georgia O’Keefe’s Black Cross and flower soul and the
Charles Demuth calendar window, and how for the
Americans there’s no light this museum before before
the Twentieth Century––as if American Impressionists
didn’t have any right. When Mary Cassatt breaks my
heart, cleanly.
But going back further there’s the
furniture, and if you really want to give a guard a
nervous breakdown try opening a 19th C bureau drawer
(some do open; and a little man jumps out and zaps
you with a serious rays gun).
However,
instead,
take another trip through the Excavation
an escutcheon flap to swing on or sway
to the provinces of one leaf of a
hinge
a long fluid flute gun
usually teeth airplane
a bay nerv-
ous excitement
gin fizz stone slab
purple orange distinct from its
design like a cry
an emerg-
ency situation about fifty miles in
diameter
dissimilated
with
…………………………………………………..pinkish to scarlet plumage
abounding in or consisting of
the floating herd of elephants
having somewhat
leaves
crystallize phases bone eyes
one’s
mouth
to strip
to supply with forage
hollow, infinitely thick, leaves
and have a cup of coffee and go to the library.
Not having
mentioned two miraculous silkscreens by Richard Estes
esp. Seagrams Bldg. and a Larry Rivers drawing self-
portrait; which I did not see today but which I see.
is presumption, so to see what is right and not do it
is cowardice”: make for your own the Art Institute of
Chicago.
________________
IN THE ART INSTITUTE LIBRARY. . .
The nun bent shameless
………….snoring––
the Venus turned out to be exquisitely
………….small––has from under black,
“attached” kind earlobes and golden
………….glasses
the lamp shade most beautiful is green lit
………….………….………..………………………………………………………………………..oh
the stairs were sagging but the
………….high lights are
globes
…………. and you walk up them
and are startled by a beautiful
black man
he doesn’t
take you in hand
and your
card you’re a member
turquoise and golden red, for example
“he would go out saying something
…. about Kiss-
then return to the game”
on masks
our faces naked
with a beautiful secluded
garden “What do plants live on?
mystery?”
strips a wine-colored cape
a pride of hearts sky himself
love sublimated
..“good grief”
oh. The snores of a nun
are holy
in that they force
they grant
the lady behind her
………….………………………………….annoyance change smile
………….………….………….……………………………………………………………….. her own
benignity
……………...…..we see a sweet and funny that
membership that rises up
………….…………………………………………………..around her
the exact likeness
………….………………………………….of days that go by
impressed her lips on a fresh collar
as traditionally American as
I think probably the best human
……………………………cry in paint
…………………………………………………………………………………..Alice Notley
…………………………………………………………………………………..August 1975